Anyone have any work arounds? No news from either developer… Post here if you have any news!

I put together a post  here of some recent thoughts regarding the direction of online media, particularly direct response versus impression media. Cliffs notes is:

• online media is a true direct response media and is better at direct response than it is brand awareness
• brand awareness activities online need new creative sizes (less commoditization) and more creative exploration
• we need to maximize the value of all the traffic we do manage to attract by making sure sites are tuned to maximize conversion

The iPad represents one of the most intuitive ways to manage email and I find I can blast through it each morning on the train, marking unread the items that require deeper assistance with my laptop (which I now leave in the office).

If I need access to any web apps safari or individual apps provide all the access I need (evernote, omnifocus, gmail). If anything requires more robust formatting or graphics tweaking, I move the drafted doc to my laptop-as-desktop via evernote, email or pages to email.

Whats striking after a month is that with mobile me and dropbox, I can keep all of my machines (including the iPad in sync quite seamlessly. This makes me yearn for a true desktop both at home and at work…a bit ironically perhaps.

I’d venture a guess that other traditional laptop only-types like me might have the same urge. So my conclusion is that desktop mac sales might actually see an increase in popularity with the advent and wider adoption of the iPad, I am curious what others think…

I just read an interesting post regarding the Droid release on Fone Frenzy.

The thing that stood out for me was that Motorola, not Verizon paid for the anti-iPhone campaign. So why do we care? Simply stated, Verizon doesn’t risk incurring Cupertino’s wrath and ruin the prospect of having a CDMA iPhone running Verizon.

An excerpt form the post:

“My sources have confirmed that Apple and Verizon have been testing a CDMA iPhone on Verizon’s 4G LTE network. Yes, you read that correctly, Verizon and Apple have been testing the first 4G phone on Verizon’s 4G network. The tests have been taking place for the last couple of months but with no confirmation on the release date.”

One might safely assume that Verizon still wants the option of having iPhone on its network after all!

1. Do you think Apple would be more, or less, successful if they adopted a more open strategy (i.e. allowing other MP3 players in iTunes)?
I agree 100% that “open always wins”. However, that implementation of that maxim is very dangerous as we have seen in the past with issues with apps not playing well with others or hurting OS performance in the windows world (and early mac OS systems. Remember the days of rebooting with extensions off to one by one rule out the offending extension?). The reason why consumer technology has been littered with frustration and failure was the lack of well thought out user experiences. Think about how many remote controllers you have with 60 buttons. Think about how many user manuals you have over 60 pages. Most tech manufactures ship a product that puts a huge onus on the technical proficiencies of the ned user. Yet most  folks simply dont have the attention or time to learn the ins and the outs of each device. People are tired of needing a secret decoder ring for each OS, device or service. Apple is popular despite its poor behavior because people know they are getting simple. (to me, the most innovative feature in the first iPhone  was its 4 page manual…it spoke worlds to how well Apple had designed the experience.

The “command and control” perspective that JobsCo employs does work with technology, as Apple has illustrated time and time again. As  we all would agree, Apple is a design company first and foremost, and what they do very well is bury complexity with design so that a broader audience of end users can adopt technology and realize the productivity benefits more easily. Things “just work” for the consumer because Apple constrains what the user can do. That being said, I think they can become more successful by becoming a more open ecosystem as you suggest.

I believe Apple’s next truly great design accomplishment will be to design an environment for their products where openness can be embraced (and where the end user assumes the risk, as you suggested in your piece). As you suggest, I believe that Apple will be forced by the market  (more consumers are getting more tech savvy and demanding more open solutions and folks like Leo, Scoble, and Peter are helping them identify the freedoms they seek). I believe Apple will find ways similar to the ones you suggest to become more open and still maintain the stability of “it just works” for the 90% of folks that dont care and are happy to be told what they want/need.

2. Do you think Apple should face serious antitrust action?

They should and they will and they will become better for it.

3. Do you think Apple’s dexterity and competence forgive their bad behavior?

To some extent (see above), it does. They have to make design decisions that restrict freedom to insure that the end user experience will be solid. Restrictions or constraints are key issues when designing great software (good read “Getting Real” form the 37 Signals team) and how you handle them will greatly effect the outcome. (For instance, unrestricted freedom results in the registry nightmares many Windows users often suffer.) I applaud Apple’s identification that design itself is a differentiator in the very highly complex world of consumer technology. Their steadfast commitment to easy and intuitive solutions will help them continue to dominate as technology becomes inherently more technical. People have less time for secret decoder rings, so Apple products will continue to grow in market share. However, as you have identified two new realities should result as we rely more and more on technical solutions:

1. Apple finds a way to design a more open user experience so that these monopolistic behaviors can be eliminated (some of them can go right now!).
2. The rest of the consumer technology industry should step up and take the design challenge to begin to design experiences that are easy and intuitive…and don’t require a CSS competency to figure out.

To apply to receive Jason’s very well thought out email newsletter, apply here: thttps://my.binhost.com/lists/listinfo/jason

the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy yellow moon

so fans so good. Now for something less generic:

my crimes patrick lives in pali Alto California

conclusion:
I really wish jobs and co would build am iPhone with a real keyboard

I cant wait till someone figures this out for project planning and contextual information linking!

iPhone Keyboard is a required offering.

I Believe the iPhone is one feature away from dominating the Enterprise AND the consumer space for smartphones/micro PCs. Steve needs to back down on his touch only mantra and design a real keyboard that slides out underneath the entire phone (a la Sony Xperia or these concepts). Apple has created a new market and ecosystem for these usable small computers that people can  lean on for most of their personal personal computing. Whats missing is a real keyboard.

Witness the thousands of teens glued to their QWERTY text messaging hardware or Blackberries. Teens are  the sweet spot for Apple’s consumer strategy. In the enterprise, to satisfy the needs of the QWERTY addicted  and really impress the large enterprises about the fact the iPhone is a true portable productivity tool, they need to build something that actually works the without any education. Ironically, I think the iPhone keypad is one of the only things Apple has  designed in a few years that requires a lot of knowledge to use properly.  Now I love my iphone, but I definitely catch myself doing less mobile mail on it due to the cludgyness of the keyboard for my hands. I prefer SMS because it allows me to be less formal and I dont have to type as much. I belive this is a lost opportunity for Apple and they need to listen to users on this one.

We need an Apple NetBook (NetMac?) yesterday…

The Hackintosh meme has left the station and its only going to get more momentum. I  and many others will likely buy a sub $400 netbook and install OSX in the coming 6 months. Personally,  I need a commuting machine and the Air is overpriced for what I need. I want somethign small to throw into a bag that I can pound out mail on the train. I also would likely use this machine for travel and weekends, rather than bringing my larger desktop laptop. Since the MobileMe sync services are working so well, it really doesn’t matter what machine I am on…everything on every machine should theoretically sync. Its working for me today on the multiple machines I use. Apple is a design company, and they design great hardware. The netbook is an opportunity to do something that is uniquely Apple and a lower cost. I believe, like the iPhone/iPod, the Apple experience on a netbook will create a great channel to recruit new converts. That and I don’t want to write a check to Dell…

What do you think…are they getting these things ready or are they going to ignore the market and push everything into the new multi-touch technology (including a netbook)??

<a href=”http://video.msn.com/?mkt=en-GB&playlist=videoByUuids:uuids:a517b260-bb6b-48b9-87ac-8e2743a28ec5&showPlaylist=true&from=shared” mce_href=”http://video.msn.com/?mkt=en-GB&amp;playlist=videoByUuids:uuids:a517b260-bb6b-48b9-87ac-8e2743a28ec5&amp;showPlaylist=true&amp;from=shared” target=”_new” title=”Future Vision Montage”>Video: Future Vision Montage</a>

This is a really nicely produced piece MSFT did about what they believe the future will look like, conveniently including the use of  future software and haptic technologies.

What’s funny about this video is that all the UIs in the video imply that in the future, Microsoft will have had some pretty serious changes of thought about the emphasis on great design. I would venture a guess that most of the concept UIs in this piece were created by designers not engineers.

I look forward a future when good design has a more strategic role in burying complexity to make our lives mote productive.

Not that we need more bureaucracy in this fine city, but this ugliness needs to go away to make the city more attractive and more livable for those of us who pay taxes here.